Researchers Say Donor Funding Will Make Malaria Drugs More Affordable


Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest burden of malaria sickness and death. In fact, 90 percent of all malaria deaths occur in Africa  according to the World Health Organization. Children under the age of five are particularly susceptible of dying from malaria and adults can be completely debilitated by the infectious disease as it zaps their energy little by little for weeks. It is important, then, that those who live in malaria prone areas have the medicinal options needed to fight off the disease.

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley and New York University business schools have written a recent paper showing that more donor funding from U.S. multilateral agencies such as the World Bank and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria as well as from foundations like the Clinton Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are critical to keeping the price of malaria drugs low for poor people to afford. Buying these Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) is literally a matter between life and death.

Pharmaceutical company Novartis, for example,  in partnership with Malaria No More donates millions of doses of coartem for free to save the lives of children, but this is not the case across the board. In fact, in most sub-Saharan African countries, malaria patients get their treatments from the private sector. Some of those malaria pills are little more than counterfeit drugs causing many countries to  require numerical codes that can be verified via mobile phones to authenticate the drugs.

While the private sector can dupe some unsuspecting  buyers — though not always — into buying inferior drugs, when the NGOs provide quality medicines, transparency and trust in the drugs are apparent as well as lower medicinal costs. Additionally, NGOs and foundations can better distribute and finance malaria medicines by looking at the shelf life of malaria medicines and subsidizing purchases for long shelf life drugs as opposed to subsidizing sales for short shelf life drugs, the researchers argue.

“The sales subsidy becomes more attractive for perishable products because you don’t have to subsidize a purchased product that doesn’t sell,” says  Terry Taylor associate professor, UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business.

See the full paper, Subsidizing the Distribution Channel: Donor Funding to Improve the Availability of Malaria Drugs.

UN Photo/Ramadan Mohamed Hassan

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s